There are some authors, I freely admit, whose books I don't read. Not because I don't think I'll like them, or because I don't think I'd be able to recommend them, but because they are already appreciated and sought out by children. Dan Gutman is, of course, like this. Very few kids need my help discovering Dan Gutman.
When you check a kid's prior reading to get a bead on his/her likes and dislikes, there are certain books you can refer to. "What did you think of Harry Potter?" is a fair question - most every kid will at least know who Harry is. The Magic Tree House books (god bless 'em but don't make me read 'em) are in this category, but not a whole lot else. Wimpy Kid. And, of course, My Weird School. You can triangulate a kid's response to these known series to find where he falls on the axes of funny / mystery / fantasy. Hm. That graph would be an interesting thing to draw. Sounds like a job for xkcd.
So I read The Genius Files, which I received as a NetGalley download, more as an evaluation of my new Sony Digital Reader than as a book to review. I picked a book that I expected would be well-crafted, so that crappy writing wouldn't poison my experience with the Reader.
Unfortunately, I was about 25 pages into the book when we boarded an airplane for ALA Midwinter, and Son Number One totally hijacked my Reader. That kid loves whatever someone else is reading. I was left reading MIT Technology Review, not a bad consolation prize, but still. All the way out to California, Son Number One cackled and exclaimed through the book, caught up in the action, loving the characters, giving me brief, giggling, incomprehensible synopses of parts that he just couldn't keep to himself.
So I get out there, and I attend the Harper Fiction Breakfast, and the nice ladies at Harper had hard copy ARCs of The Genius Files. And I took one, dammit, because I wanted to read it too! Also, because when that kid finds a book he likes he reads it at least twice.
Now, after all this buildup, do you really need me to review the book? Here is my review: it is fun. There are weird bad guys, wacky gadgets, and a cross-country road trip. The main characters, twins named Coke and Pepsi, are good-humored and resourceful, with the requisite oblivious parents. The reader is encouraged to follow Coke and Pep's continental odyssey using a road atlas and Google Maps, both explicitly and by the inclusion of silly, intriguing landmarks like the World's Largest Ball of Twine (two of them) and the House on the Rock.
I love books like this - a funny mystery appeals to just about everyone, and when that funny mystery is written with this kind of ease and confidence you feel like you're putting those kids into good hands.
As a parent, are you worried at all that the book's main characters trustingly go along with strangers who claim they're trying to help, and that the strangers tell them it's all part of a massive conspiracy and the children must therefore keep it all a secret from their parents? That kind of content is easy to overlook in an adventure story (like when reading Harry Potter it's easy to overlook the fact that Harry and his friends consistently disobey their caregivers to put themselves in extreme danger, and are inevitably rewarded for such behaviour.) One school of thought has it that anything that gets kids reading at all, these days, can't be all bad; but I, and some people I know, wonder if that's really the case. Of course it's always a good idea to make sure you know what kind of content your child is being exposed to and have a frank discussion about issues you find worrisome... but maybe some of these books should also have warnings. "Young Adult Fiction - warning: contains principal characters making extremely bad decisions and doing things you would just die if you knew YOUR kids were doing." What's your take?
Posted by: Douglas | Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 01:04 AM
Douglas, that is an excellent observation - the part about "don't tell your parents" is pretty specifically a red flag that should maybe be addressed...
But, after thinking about this issue kind of a lot - I first soul-searched myself about it when I reviewed Diary of a Wimpy Kid - I have come to the conclusion that only an unusually out-of-touch kid would use the behavior of kids in books (or movies or TV or games) as his or her touchstone about what's safe or appropriate. And if you've got that kid, you probably know it, and are used to handing out warnings and caveats already.
For most of us - adults AND kids - fiction is one of the blow-off valves whereby we can experience situations that we would never encounter (or hope to never encounter) in real life. I hope to never be trapped in a cave like Tom Sawyer, or chased by a guy on a motorcycle like the kids in this book, but it sure is fun to watch it happen, see how those kids react, wonder what I would do in the same place!
The behavior that I AM bothered by in children's books is inconsiderate, hurtful behavior that is presented as funny or cool. I dislike the mean girls in YA series fiction sniping and gossiping at each other, because I think that some girls will aspire to that kind of queen bee status. And I still do not care for Greg Heffley in the Wimpy Kid books getting away with being such a jerk, because I think little boys will come away thinking that being mean and obnoxious is funny.
On the other hand, it would probably take a miracle for little boys to stop seeing humor in obnoxiousness, so I have kind of stepped off my soapbox on this one. :)
Thanks for reading!
Posted by: :paula | Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM